This is our old blog. It hasn't been active since 2011. Please see the link above for our current blog or click the logo above to see all of the great data and content on this site.

Ladies and gentlemen: your NL home run leader

Posted by Andy on August 15, 2011

It's none other than Albert Pujols.

His rate stats are still well off from his career averages and he's still leading the league in GIDP, but he also might lead the NL in homers for the third straight year.

One very interesting stat, though, is intentional walks:

Year G PA IBB
2000 133 544 7
2005 161 700 27
2006 143 634 28
2007 158 679 22
2008 148 641 34
2009 160 700 44
2010 159 700 38
2011 106 468 6
Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 8/15/2011.

Even with Holliday and Berkman behind him, pitchers don't seem nearly as afraid...

40 Responses to “Ladies and gentlemen: your NL home run leader”

  1. JustEd Says:

    He has really turned it on in the last month or so. He's got a decent shot at getting that average up to .300, I think.

  2. JoeThunder Says:

    If the Cards somehow win the NL Central is he your NL MVP for a 4th time?

  3. Kevin Says:

    Of course his intentional walk totals will go down when the guy behind him has 28 homers.

  4. Jimbo Says:

    "Even with Holliday and Berkman behind him, pitchers don't seem nearly as afraid..."

    Just take the word "even" off that sentence....

  5. Andy Says:

    There have been other good hitters behind Pujols before, but just like with Bonds, Pujols was often walked intentionally regardless. But now that Pujols' hitting is 'merely' excellent, he's not getting the Bonds treatment.

  6. jim Says:

    isn't lineup protection a myth anyway?

  7. Andy Says:

    You're right that my inclusion of the word 'even' is quite wrong.

  8. Ed Says:

    @1 JustEd Pujols hit .295 in July and is at .294 for August. He's not going to reach .300 that way.

  9. John Says:

    Even more interesting, Pujols is 1 back in runs scored. This would be the 6th time he's lead the league, and second time three consecutive years! So he would have lead the league in HR and Runs scored for three straight years. I see Ruth did it back in the day, has anyone else?

  10. Dukeofflatbush Says:

    Andy, you pointed out his drop in IBB, but what about his 103 to 40 BB drop off. Is there anyway to check for steepest drop off in BBs for guys with at least 100 the season before?

  11. Larry R. Says:

    Maris had 0 intentional walks in '61. Who's batting behind you has everything to do with it.

  12. Tom Says:

    "isn't lineup protection a myth anyway?"

    Anyone have a comment on this? There has always been a ton of talk here in Philly about "protecting" Ryan Howard. It always seemed backwards to me. If he's your $25m hitter then pitchers should be throwing more strikes to the #3 hitter so as not to face Howard with runners on. Also, he should be getting on base so pitchers are pressured to throw more strikes to the #5 guy. However, the sentiment is 100% the other way around.

  13. John DiFool Says:

    There's two kinds of protection-a good hitter behind you reducing the number of IBB, vs. the guy behind you giving you better pitches to hit. The former unquestionly exists (the Giants IMHO screwed up badly by not signing another elite hitter to put behind Bonds, as in that one year when he had 232 walks, the next batter rarely did anything after a Barry IBB-yes I checked). The latter is more mythological than real.

  14. Andy Says:

    I think John is oversimplifying a bit but basically has got it right in #13. IBBs are, nearly always, strategic decisions made before the first pitch of a plate appearance. (Too much emphasis is given to the "unintentional intentional walk". The IBB decision is based on the strength of the hitter at the plate, the base-out situation, and the strength of the hitter(s) on deck. So, yes, clearly there is a major effect from the strength of the hitters than follow in the lineup, particularly since base-out effects tend to even out over the season.

    In terms of seeing better pitches, I don't think it happens too much. Pitchers are taught not to nibble, especially with strikeouts rates at an all-time high. I think pitchers tend to be aggressive with the first couple of pitches of an at-bat, and if they get ahead, try to get a strikeout or swing at a pitch with movement, and if they fall behind, they are more likely to stay outside the zone and let the batter walk. I don't think, though, that 2-3 pitches into an at-bat they are thinking about who's on deck and using that info to determine whether to throw a strike or a ball--I think they are thinking only about the current hitter, the count, the set-up, etc.

  15. John Autin Says:

    It's funny, Andy -- I was all set to use that very title if Uggla took over the HR lead!

  16. Doug B Says:

    twice this season I've seen Yuniesky Bettancourt starting in the 5-hole batting behind Prince Fielder.

  17. Doug B Says:

    of course... it's not like Casey McGehee is doing much in that 5 hole for the Brewers.

  18. tim Says:

    And, according to 60 Minutes, he's a darn nice guy too. Which is surprising, because when you see him at the plate, he looks like he wants to kill everything in his path.

  19. John Says:

    Umm... did you just link to a generic leader board on mlb.com, from a blog post on baseball-reference.com?

    Why, pray tell, would I traverse the internet tubes to mlb.com to get baseball stats?

  20. ˈdɛvən jʌŋɡ Says:

    Albert is Awesome.

    But I can't help but notice that since 2008, his BA & OBP have been steadily dropping and his K's have been slowly rising. Altho this year he might end up with a little less strikeouts than last year. Still, I'm beginning to wonder if maybe Albert's begun to fade in '09 but he's so good that it's barely noticeable. I hope I'm totally off on that, 'cause I'd love to see some more great seasons from Pujols.

  21. Anon Says:

    ****OFF TOPIC**** - post idea: just noticed that Colin Cowgill of the DBacks is a righty hitter, lefty thrower. Thought I remembered that was pretty rare so played a little with the Play Index. Looks to me like he is only the 41st position player to be righty/lefty. In addition, with Cody Ross & Ryan Ludwick also featuring this, it looks like the 1st time in a long time that there have been 3 such players in the majors at the same time.

    BTW, it is much more common with pitchers - I got 442 pitchers that are righty/lefty.

    FWIW

  22. Zachary Says:

    There are 3 differences in Pujols' game this year.

    1. Fewer doubles.
    2. More strikes.
    3. More ground balls.

    He's hitting fewer doubles because he's hitting more ground balls. He's seeing more strikes - probably because of the lineup protection issue. I suspect that the biggest reason he's hitting more ground balls is because his contact rate is so high and he's seeing so many strikes. He can't be as selective as before, so he puts balls in play that maybe he wouldn't before.

    That's my two cents. He can still rake, of course, and even though he's probably beginning his decline, there's no reason he can't pull off a fine old man career. He's a line drive power hitter with good plate discipline, and that's the kind of thing that ages well.

  23. stan cook Says:

    With respect to the lineup protection issue; Adrian Gonzales has walked only 47 times this year.

  24. Lawrence Azrin Says:

    @21/ Anon - would the best righty hitter, lefty thrower (position player) be Rickey Henderson?

  25. Anon Says:

    @24 - Rickey by a wide margin: 113 WAR v 22.6 for #2 Hal chase.

    BTW I said there are 3 active and that hasn't happened in a long time but I was way off. I believe there were 6 or 7 in 2003 if I counted correctly

  26. Lawrence Azrin Says:

    @25/ Anon - thanks; any speculation why this combination is so rare amongst position players?

    I'll start by noting that lefty throwers cannot play third, second, short, or catcher. This still leaves first base and all three outfield positions, though. Could it be that most lefty throwers are also naturally lefty batters? (Forgive me if I am stating the incredibly obvious...)

  27. Jeff Says:

    @5

    No one, not even Pujols has EVER gotten the Bonds treatment. 30-40 IBB's isn't 120 BB's. Bonds averaged for his career over 30 a season. Let's not get careless with our words here. If Bonds ever had a better park to hit in(which he never did) and better hitters around him(Rich Aurilia, Edgardo Alfonso, J.T. Snow, Pedro Feliz, Glenallen Hill to name a few hitters behind Bonds over the years) besides 5 Jeff Kent years his numbers would be even better.

  28. Atom Says:

    Most of Albert's deflated stats occured in the first two months. Since June 3rd, which marked the end of his beginning of the year slump, he is hitting .315/.374/.695 in 48 games.

    Here are those numbers pro-rated to a 156 game season:

    PA: 700
    Hits: 198
    2B: 48
    HR: 64
    RBI: 141
    BB: 58

    Albert's hitting problems this season are actually just his hitting problem in April and May. Except for the walks part. He is still walking at the lowest pace of his career.

  29. Atom Says:

    A few comments above about Pujols walk total seem to indicate he's not walking because he has good hitters behind him.

    Might I throw in that he is walking at the *lowest* rate of his career. A career that saw Jim Edmonds (1.005 OPS from 01-04) hitting behind him, Scott Rolen before that...and Matt Holliday was there last year too.

    So, lineup "protection" isn't new for Pujols.

  30. nightfly Says:

    There have been lefty catchers. In theory, it might make it harder to throw out guys stealing third, but otherwise, there's really no reason why a lefty *can't* be a catcher, because his basic throws are back to the pitcher and down to second base - straight on ahead - unlike 2b, 3b, and ss, where the most frequent play is back towards first base. A middle INF trying to turn two would be especially awkward and vulnerable to getting run over.

    I found five lefty catchers in MLB history according to the site in the link. I'm sure others could have been very good receivers if their coaches had been open to the idea.

  31. Johnny Twisto Says:

    Could it be that most lefty throwers are also naturally lefty batters?

    Of course.

    There is an advantage to batting lefty, so lots of natural righties learn to do so. Not sure how people end up the other way around.

  32. nightfly Says:

    **clarification - five lefty catchers with 200 or more career games.

  33. dj Says:

    @1 JustEd Pujols hit .295 in July and is at .294 for August. He's not going to reach .300 that way.

    not correct ed #8
    pujols is having a great august so far. in 13 games he has 5 hrs and 10 rbis. hitting .327 (18-55) and has scored 13 runs.

    since his return from the DL in early july he has played in 34 games and hit .308 with 28 runs scored and 12 hrs. he has knocked in 30 runs.

    with 41 games to go, if he remains anywhere near as hot as he has been in the last few weeks he will once again reaqch for the 11th straight ime the .300+ batting avg/30+ hrs/100+ rbis plateau that ONLY pujols has reached for the first 10 yrs of his remarkable career.

  34. Bip Says:

    The Dodgers have done a terrible job of protecting Matt Kemp, and his IBB total kind of shows it (15 this year after a previous career high of 6) but it's still less dramatic than I would expect. Typically hitting after Kemp has been Juan Uribe and James Loney. Since Kemp has batted in the 4 spot all year, I can look at the 2011 Dodgers 5 spot and see that it has an OPS of .686, which is almost 300 points lower than Kemp's OPS. In fact, the difference between Kemp and the hitter following him has been so dramatic that even Vin Scully, who I've always thought of as being very impartial, has repeatedly commented that he doesn't understand why anyone would ever pitch to Matt Kemp in any important situation.

  35. stan cook Says:

    They are not yet convinced that Kemp is that good or that he cannot be pitched to. Can anybody remember, without looking, who batted behind Sosa in 1998?

  36. kds Says:

    A couple of things about Lefty throwing catchers. About 2/3+ there would be a "arm side " batter when they were throwing to 2nd on a steal atempt. This may cause problems relative to a righty thrower. Even worse when the baserunner is trying to steal 3rd.

    If a player can throw well enough to be a catcher, but not hit well enough to play the outfield, and throws lefty; he will get lots of chances to be a pitcher.

  37. Evan Says:

    Re: Left-handed throwing catchers

    When I was playing little league everyone provided their own glove, except that the catcher's mitt was provided by the team/league and there was 1 or 2 per team. If you threw with your left hand, you had 2 options: provide your own catching mitt or play another position.

    I'm curious if this was consistent with others' experiences. If it is, I would think that lack of access to equipment might be a significant reason for the lack of left-handed catchers.

  38. LLD Says:

    @ 14: The phrase "unintentional intentional walk" is actually backwards, but announcers don't often seem to think about what they're saying (what a surprise!). The act of pitching "around" a batter without officially issuing an IBB should actually be called an "intentional unintentional walk".

  39. jason Says:

    i told you already. pujols will hit .301, the same number alex gordon of the royals will end up at.

  40. Rich Says:

    @ 38 ha, very true
    I guess a legit unintentional intentional walk would be like Rick Ankiel in the playoffs for the Cardinals