This is our old blog. It hasn't been active since 2011. Please see the link above for our current blog or click the logo above to see all of the great data and content on this site.

Eric Chavez

Posted by Andy on May 20, 2009

News has come out that Chavez may be forced to retire due to his latest injury, a herniated disk.

From 2001 to 2005, Chavez was unarguably the best third baseman in baseball, leading all in HR and RBI:

  Cnt Player             **HR** From  To   Ages   G    PA    AB    R    H   2B  3B  RBI  BB  IBB  SO  HBP  SH  SF GDP  SB   CS   BA   OBP   SLG   OPS  Positions Teams
+----+-----------------+-------+----+----+-----+----+-----+-----+----+----+---+---+----+----+---+----+---+---+---+---+----+---+-----+-----+-----+-----+---------+-----------+
    1 Eric Chavez         151   2001 2005 23-27  745  3182  2825  451  785 173   9  502  321  46  535  11   0  25  59   36  11  .278  .351  .506  .857 *5/D763   OAK
    2 Aramis Ramirez      146   2001 2005 23-27  727  3007  2742  380  782 160   3  484  195  20  416  35   0  35  87    9   9  .285  .337  .505  .842 *5/D      PIT-TOT-CHC
    3 Troy Glaus          142   2001 2005 24-28  615  2622  2221  377  559 119   7  408  356  20  572  23   0  22  49   33  13  .252  .358  .503  .861 *5/D6     ANA-ARI
    4 Adrian Beltre       124   2001 2005 22-26  755  3065  2822  352  765 146  12  423  193  24  476  21   4  25  69   32  14  .271  .320  .463  .783 *5/6D     LAD-SEA
    5 Scott Rolen         123   2001 2005 26-30  658  2793  2389  420  677 161  15  473  325  21  453  48   1  30  58   42  17  .283  .376  .518  .894 *5        PHI-TOT-STL
    6 Tony Batista        114   2001 2004 27-30  635  2624  2431  312  582 113  10  383  136  19  400  24   4  29  56   28  15  .239  .283  .435  .718 *5/D6     TOT-BAL-MON
    7 Mike Lowell         109   2001 2005 27-31  744  3077  2738  372  750 188   3  440  274  23  384  25   1  39  70   17   7  .274  .341  .464  .805 *5/4D     FLA
    8 Vinny Castilla      106   2001 2005 33-37  726  2934  2700  336  699 164  10  425  177  23  458  27   2  28 104   10   9  .259  .308  .445  .753 *5/6      TOT-ATL-COL-WSN
    9 Corey Koskie         91   2001 2005 28-32  639  2679  2297  364  617 147   9  348  310  31  551  44   0  28  51   61  26  .269  .362  .459  .821 *5/D      MIN-TOR
   10 Hank Blalock         89   2002 2005 21-24  512  2205  1985  292  543 113   6  309  190  10  421  11   2  17  47    5   5  .274  .338  .471  .809 *5/4D     TEX

A bit of a career oddity about Chavez: in 2004, he lead the AL with 95 walks despite playing in only 125 games, and also despite the fact that he generally walked only a moderate amount in his career, averaging 70 walks over a typical 162-game season.

In the 2004 season in which Chavez led the AL with 95 walks, Barry Bonds led the NL with (gulp) 232 walks. Chavez's total is the lowest to lead the AL since Dwight Evans' 85 in 1981, which doesn't really count since that was a shortened season. The real most recent season with a lower leading total is 1965, when Rocky Colavito led with 93 walks.

12 Responses to “Eric Chavez”

  1. Wooden U. Lykteneau Says:

    Sure, as long as you don't consider defense.

  2. Andy Says:

    Yeah, I did mean best offensive 3rd-baseman.

  3. JohnnyTwisto Says:

    It's not clear to me that Chavez was the best offensive third baseman for that period. (BTW, you refer to 2000 in your post, but the stats run from 2001.) Scott Rolen missed a lot of time in '05, but when healthy he may have been a better hitter than Chavez. His OPS+ was about 10 points higher.

    And Wooden's comment is odd, as Chavez was a great fielder. But of course, Rolen probably has a slight edge there as well.

  4. JohnnyTwisto Says:

    I thought Chavez was right in the mix for the MVP award in '04 until he got hurt and missed the end of the season.

  5. Andy Says:

    Thanks for the date correction, Johnny. I had to change it since Glaus hit 47 bombs in 2000.

  6. Gelliot Says:

    Chavez won the Gold Glove every year from 2001-2006. I think his defense credentials are an argument for, not against, being the best 3rd baseman in that period.

    That being said, I've watched a lot of A's games over the years, and I always thought his defensive numbers were good because he didn't try to make a lot of really hard plays.

  7. Andy Says:

    That was exactly the knock against Chavez--he was great on balls hit to/near him but didn't have great range. I have no idea whether the numbers back this up--that was at least his reputation.

  8. JohnnyTwisto Says:

    I've never heard that knock on Chavez, and I certainly didn't see him enough to know myself. But if he didn't try to make hard plays, that would only help his fielding %. Any modern, advanced fielding stat (not that they're perfect) counts plays made, not misplays made. Whether Chavez muffed a ball or didn't come near it shouldn't have any impact on his numbers. And to my knowledge, Chavez always rated quite well in the advanced stats. The TotalZone numbers right on this site show him as an excellent defender at his best.

  9. gerry Says:

    The curse of Eddie Collins. The Athletics are the only franchise of the 16 that have been with us since 1901 to have no player with a career of 15 years or longer who played for no other franchise. Pete Suder (tied with pitcher Eddie Rommel) is the record-holder, as he played 13 seasons for the As, and never for any other franchise - Chavez is in his 12th season. Suder also holds the records for games, plate appearances, at-bats, and hits for As-only players, but Chavez has clear title to the HR leadership with 229 to 80 for Dick Green.

  10. tomepp Says:

    As far as Bonds' 232 walks in 2004 go, 120 of them were intentional. His 112 non-intentional walks ranked him 4th, behind Bobby Abreu (117 non-IBB), J.D. Drew (116), and Lance Berkman (113). Still, 112 non-IBBs is pretty impressive considering he had less than 500 plate appearances in which he was not intentionally walked (497 non-IBB PA).

  11. jksesq1 Says:

    He was *unarguably" the best??

    To paraphrase Andre the Giant, I do not think that word means what you think it means.

  12. Andy Says:

    You know...my spell checker desperately wanted me to use that word even though I didn't think it was the right one. Odd.