This is our old blog. It hasn't been active since 2011. Please see the link above for our current blog or click the logo above to see all of the great data and content on this site.

How Lousy is Alex Gordon’s Start?

Posted by Chris J. on June 13, 2007

I don't thing it's much of a secret that Royals phenom Alex Gordon has gotten off to a surprisingly bad start this year.  Heading into today's action, he was hitting .198 with an OBP & SLG both barely over .300.  Through 58 games, he has an OPS+ of 61.

Let's put this in perspective using the Play Index.

- Go to the Batting Season Finder and set the following qualifications:

- From years 1901 to 2007, when has a rookie (choice from first season to first season of a player's career in the far left column), among third basemen (since all positions come marked off, unmark all boxes except the 3B one).

- Search for an OPS+ of 65 or worse and games played at 50 or more.  I raised the OPS+ a bit and lowered the Games to get those a little better, er, a little less worse to put Gordon in the middle of the sample size.  You can choose a different criteria if you'd like.

With that search, it turns out that Gordon's only the fifteenth rookie at the corner to hit this poorly.  He has the 12th worst OPS+ of any with at least 50 games.  Ouch.

3 Responses to “How Lousy is Alex Gordon’s Start?”

  1. birtelcom Says:

    If I understand your PI methodology here, what you are picking up this way is a player's "debut" year, rather than what is usually defined as his "rookie" year. Sometimes, that's the same thing, but often it is not. A player may only play a handful of games (or even one game) in, say, a September callup in his "debut" year, and then play a full rookie year the next year. In that case I don't think your approach will pick up the "rookie" year. Or am I missing something?

  2. admin Says:

    Yeah, we don't have rookie years coded in. Technically a player can have multiple rookie years which is a bit of a mess.

  3. Chris J. Says:

    Good catch. Instead of rookie, it would be more accurate to say first-year player.